By Don Peppers and
Martha Rogers, Ph.D., INSIDE 1-to-1 Privacy, December 14,
2006
Of all the privacy/security breaches that came to light
over the past few years, few seemed to shake consumer and
corporate confidence more than the one that hamstrung data
giant ChoicePoint. Perhaps it had to do with the surprising
simplicity of the violation – the firm allowed scammers
posing as legitimate small businesses to access its data.
The firestorm was swift and certain as privacy and security
critics hammered the company like they had few others.
But many experts probably are scratching their heads now
that former ChoicePoint critics repeatedly have praised the
firm for the steps it took in the wake of the privacy/security
crisis. How is it possible that a company which, only a year
ago, was the not-so-proud recipient of a “Lifetime Menace
Award” from Privacy International can now be celebrated
as one of the business world’s most vigilant privacy
and security practitioners?
To hear Carol DiBattiste tell it, ChoicePoint really had
no other choice. DiBattiste, who joined the company as Chief
Credentialing, Compliance and Privacy Officer in April 2005
and has since been elevated to General Counsel/Chief Privacy
Officer, was charged by the company’s top execs with
taking a thorough and comprehensive look at its practices.
“They were committed to turning it around,” DiBattiste
said. “They were going to fix things in whatever way
they had to, expending whatever resources they had to.”
The privacy/security revival began even before DiBattiste
arrived. Immediately after the company became aware of the
breach, it significantly curtailed the access of certain customers
to the most sensitive information (Social Security and drivers’
license numbers). The decision essentially cut off certain
types of customers, such as private investigators and other
similar small businesses, entirely. It cost ChoicePoint $15
to $20 million and its competitors remain more than happy
to provide that service.
When DiBattiste assumed control of the process, she brought
in Ernst & Young’s privacy team and invited input
from individuals within ChoicePoint’s other business
units. Her first task was to strengthen the firm’s credentialing
process for would-be customers. She centralized the credentialing
team at the firm’s Alpharetta, Georgia, headquarters
(previously, people within the geographically diverse business
units had handled the task) and led the effort to re-credential
all customers, save for law-enforcement agencies and public
companies.
The credentialing process now involves two checklists, one
designed to definitively verify the identity and trustworthiness
of customers and another for customer site visits. “If
they fail either, they’re denied access to our data.
It’s over,” she said.
ChoicePoint also has overhauled its privacy and security
policies, bolstering procedures that cover everything from
physical- and remote-access security to incident response
to data destruction. Most stringent is the third-party service
provider policy. Fearing that individuals who enter ChoicePoint
facilities could be exposed to sensitive personal information,
the firm now asks vendors to fill out a 24-question self-assessment
questionnaire. Vendors that don’t give privacy and security
training to employees who potentially could come into contact
with ChoicePoint information, for example, no longer make
the cut.
DiBattiste led the charge on the audit/compliance front as
well. “You can have all the credentialing and policies
you want, but what’s the point if you’re not checking
to see if they work?” she said.
Finally, ChoicePoint moved to better educate its own employees.
The company now asks staffers to complete mandatory privacy,
information security and code of conduct training programs.
New employees must complete the programs within 30 days of
being hired; all employees are tested on the procedures, with
an 80 percent score required for a passing grade.
As for other companies who find themselves compromised on
the privacy/security front, DiBattiste offers three nuggets
of advice. First, every company – not just ones that
regularly traffic in personal data – should have policies
and procedures in place. Second, transparency in the immediate
wake of a breach is crucial, as are communications about any/all
steps that are being taken to right a wrong. Third, constant
vigilance – whether via regular audits or other practices
– remains key. “You have to do it. You have to
check,” DiBattiste stressed. “Companies always,
always need to be worried about this.”
|